Hu X, Frellesen C, Bauer RW et al., Computed tomography of dynamic changes of the aortic root during systole and diastole in patients with coronary artery calcification. Radiol Med. 2015 Jul;120(7):595-602
LinkGoo HW, Park SH., Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;31 Suppl 2:223-232
LinkFoldyna B, Jungert C, Luecke C et al., CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug;31(6):1233-1242
LinkDe Cock J, Zanca F, Canning J et al., A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):1891-1900
LinkŻycinska K, Straburzynski M, Nitsch-Osuch A et al., Lund-Mackay system for computed tomography evaluation of paranasal sinuses in patients with granulomatosis and polyangiitis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;884:13-19
LinkDemeslay J, Vergez S, Serrano E et al, Morphological concordance between CBCT and MDCT: a paranasal sinus-imaging anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Jan;38(1):71-78
LinkWuest W, May M, Saake M et al., Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses: minimizing X-ray exposure with spectral shaping. Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb 24. [Epub ahead of print]
LinkPetik B., Inferior vena cava anomalies and variations: imaging and rare clinical findings. Insights Imaging. 2015 Dec;6(6):631-639.
LinkMorita S, Nishina Y, Yamazaki H et al., Dual adrenal venous phase contrast-enhanced MDCT for visualization of right adrenal veins in patients with primary aldosteronism. Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct 22. [Epub ahead of print]
LinkDoshi AM, Hoffman D, Kierans AS et al., Differentiation of deep venous thrombosis from femoral vein mixing artifact on routine abdominopelvic CT. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3191-5.
LinkHorvath JJ, Looney CB, Nelson RC, Kim CY, Venous filling defects on portal venous phase CT of the abdomen and pelvis: clinical implications and positive predictive value for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis. Abdom Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(3):554-61.
LinkDi Martino M, Saba L, Bosco S et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic liver: clinical, radiological and pathological findings. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1446-54.
LinkBendik E, Noël PB, Münzel D et al. Evaluation of a method for improving the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):250-5.
LinkBoas FE, Kamaya A, Do B et al. Classification of hypervascular liver lesions based on hepatic artery and portal vein blood supply coefficients calculated from triphasic CT scans.. J Digit Imaging. 2015 Apr;28(2):213-23.
LinkMarin D, Mileto A, Gupta RT et al. Effect of radiologists’ experience with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm on detection of hypervascular liver lesions and perception of image quality.. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2850-60.
LinkBehrenbeck TR, McCollough CH, Miller WL et al. Early changes in myocardial microcirculation in asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic subjects: as detected by perfusion CT. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Mar;42(3):515-525
LinkKo SM, Hwang HK, Kim SM, Cho IH. Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31 Suppl 1:1-21
LinkFeger S, Rief M, Zimmermann E et al. Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography, myocardial CT perfusion, myocardial perfusion MRI, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):2115-2124
LinkItami H, Tokunaga K, Okuma Y et al. Novel 3D-CT evaluation of carotid stent volume: greater chronological expansion of stents in patients with vulnerable plaques. Neuroradiology. 2013 Sep;55(9):1153-1160
LinkKorn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H et al. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;25(1):33-40
Link

